The AzAs (Antizionist Antisemitism) Scale: Measuring Antisemitism as Expressed in Relation to Israel and Its Supporters
This paper reports on the development and testing of the AzAs (Antizionist Antisemitism) scale: a six-item questionnaire instrument for measuring antisemitic attitudes as articulated in the language of hostility to Israel and its supporters. It is important to be able to recognize and measure this kind of antisemitism because it is often embedded within ostensibly democratic discourse. The identification of this antisemitism is frequently contested even by those who are in broad agreement on the recognition of older forms of antisemitism. The scale contains a balance of protrait and contrait items, and achieved a satisfactory level of internal consistency when piloted on a sample of US-based respondents recruited through the Mechanical Turk crowdsourcing market (N = 122). There appears to be no relationship between scores on the scale and the subjective political position of respondents (as measured on a left-right self-report scale). We suggest that the AzAs scale will be of general use in measuring antizionist antisemitism because (a) it collects several familiar and demonstrably antisemitic ideas expressed in relation to Israel and its supporters and (b) it exhibits good psychometric properties.
Keywords: Antisemitism, Antizionism, Attitudes, Israel, Questionnaire instrument
Full Text:Subscribers Only
A version of this paper was presented at the 14th Conference of the European Sociological Association (Manchester, 2019. The authors are grateful for feedback received on that occasion.
*Address for correspondence: firstname.lastname@example.org
W. Frindte, S. Wettig, and D. Wammetsberger, “Old and New Antisemitic Attitudes in the Context of Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation: Two Studies in Germany,” Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology 11, no. 3 (2005): 239-266; E. H. Kaplan and C. A. Small, “Anti-Israel Sentiment Predicts Antisemitism in Europe, Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology 50, no. 4 (2006): 548-561; F. Cohen, L. Jussim, K. D. Harber, and G. Bhasin, “Modern Antisemitism and Anti-Israeli Attitudes,” Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology 97, no. 2 (2009): 390-306; L. Weinstein and C. Jackson, “College Student Antisemitism and Anti-Israeli Sentiment, College Studies Journal 44, no. 2 (2010): 265-267; V. Swami, “Social Psychological Origins of Conspiracy Theories: The Case of the Jewish Conspiracy Theory in Malaysia,” Frontiers in Psychology 3, no. 228 (2012): 1-19; R. Jaspal, “Antisemitism and Anti-Zionism in Iran: The Effects of Identity, Threat, and Political Threat,” Contemporary Jewry 35, no. 3 (2015); L. D. Staetsky, Antisemitism in Contemporary Great Britain: A Study of Attitudes Towards Jews and Israel, (London: Institute for Jewish Policy Research, 2017) https://cst.org.uk/public/data/file/7/4/JPR.2017.Antisemitism%20in%20contemporary%20Great%20Britain.pdf.
R. Wistrich, The Politics of Ressentiment: Israel, Jews and the German Media (Jerusalem: Vidal Sassoon International Center for the Study of Antisemitism, 2004); P.-A. Taguieff, Rising from the Muck: The New Anti-Semitism in Europe (Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 2004); D. Hirsh, Anti-Zionism and Antisemitism: Cosmopolitan Reflections (New Haven: Yale Initiative for the Interdisciplinary Study of Antisemitism, 2007); A. Julius, Trials of the Diaspora: A History of Anti-Semitism in England (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010); R. Jaspal, Antisemitism and Anti-Zionism: Representation, Cognition, and Everyday Talk (Abingdon: Routledge, 2014), 211-235; D. Hirsh, Contemporary Left Antisemitism (Abingdon: Routledge, 2017); D. Rich, The Left’s Jewish Problem: Jeremy Corbyn, Israel, and Anti-Semitism, 2nd ed. (London: Biteback Publishing, 2016). David M., Seymour, “Antisemitism and Antizionism: Ideologies of the Jewish Question,” Journal of Contemporary Antisemitism 2, no. 2 (2019).
J. K. Nelson, “Denial of Racism and Its Implications for Local Action,” Discourse and Society 24, no. 1 (2013): 89.
Staetsky, Antisemitism, 22, 29.
See, Catherine D. Chatterley, “Leaving the Post-Holocaust Period: The Effects of Anti-Israel Attitudes on Perceptions of the Holocaust,” in Anti-Zionism and Antisemitism: The Dynamics of Delegitimization, ed. Alvin H. Rosenfeld (Indiana: Indiana University Press, 2019), 158-174.
Staetsky, Antisemitism, 36.
Assaf Orion and Shahar Eilam, “Highlights of the Strategic Assessment,” in The Delegitimization and BDS Threat to Israel and Diaspora Jewry, ed. Assaf Orion and Shahar Eilam (Tel Aviv: Institute for National Security Studies, 2019), 28-29.
See Hirsh, Contemporary Left Antisemitism, chapter 4.
Orion and Shahar, “Highlights of the Strategic Assessment,” 26.
Benjamin Weinthal, “German Court Calls Synagogue Torching a ‘Justified Action to Criticize Israel’,” Jerusalem Post, January 15, 2017.
Thorsten Fuchshuber, “From Wilhelm Marr to Mavi Marmara: Antisemitism and Anti-Zionism as Forms of Anti-Jewish Action,” in Rosenfeld, Anti-Zionism and Antisemitism, 30-52.
Fuchshuber, “From Wilhelm Marr to Mavi Marmara, 35.
Stephen Miller, Margaret Harris, and Colin Shindler, The Attitudes of British Jews Towards Israel (London: City University, 2015).
See N. Cohn, Warrant for Genocide: The Myth of the Jewish World-Conspiracy and the Protocols of the Elders of Zion (London: Eyre & Spottiswoode, 1967).
L. Klaff, “Holocaust Inversion and Contemporary Antisemitism,” fathom (Winter 2014), http://fathomjournal.org/holocaust-inversion-and-contemporary-antisemitism/.
IHRA, “Working Definition of Antisemitism,” https://www.holocaustremembrance.com/working-definitionantisemitism.
James Wald, “The New Replacement Theory: Anti-Zionism, Antisemitism, and the Denial of History,” in Rosenfeld, Anti-Zionism and Antisemitism, 10.
Staetsky, Antisemitism, 29.
Mechanical Turk is a crowdsourcing marketplace owned by Amazon.
For explanation of TurkPrime, see Leib Litman, Jonathan Robinson, and Tzvi Abberbock, “TurkPrime.com: a Versatile Crowdsourcing Data Acquisition Platform for the Behavioral Sciences,” Behavior Research Methods 49, no. 2: 433-442.
See the effectively identical Cronbach’s alpha for the much longer “anti-Israel” scale used in the Jewish Policy Research study (Staetsky, Antisemitism, 33).
William Revelle, psych: Procedures for Psychological, Psychometric, and Personality Research. Version 1.8.10, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych; Hadley Wickham. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (New York: Springer-Verlag, 2009).
- There are currently no refbacks.